Nematode Behavior: The Taste of Success, the Smell of Danger!

Through experience, the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans learns to distinguish high quality bacteria — food — from low quality or toxic bacteria. Increased release of the neurotransmitter serotonin onto identified interneurons determines whether C. elegans chooses to feed or leave.

The ability to acquire food is critical for all organisms to survive. The first task is to locate food and to distinguish it from all of the other things in the environment; the second is to assess whether this is good food or whether to keep searching. If you happen to be a nematode such as Caenorhabditis elegans moving through the soil, your food is bacteria, and you find it by chemical cues. Several recent studies have increased our understanding of how C. elegans finds and makes decisions about food.

There are many different kinds of bacteria in the soil, some of them are nutritious for C. elegans, some of them are hard to eat and not very nutritious, while others are actually toxic. Recent work has shown that C. elegans learns about its food through experience. Shtonda and Avery [1] tested whether C. elegans is a picky eater: they found that the worm has a kind of hunting behavior that changes depending on the type of food they find. ‘Hunting’ is defined by two different forms of locomotion: dwelling, which is movement with frequent stops and reversals; and roaming, which is straight, rapid movement forward. When worms find themselves near what they consider ‘good food’ they dwell, and rarely roam; when they near what they consider bad food, roaming is very common.

How does a worm define ‘good’ or ‘bad’ food? In an earlier paper, Avery and Shtonda [2] showed that different strains of bacteria differ in their ability to support growth and reproduction in C. elegans. In the new paper [1], they used five strains of bacteria that differ in their ability to support C. elegans growth. They tested the behavioral response of wild-type worms to these five strains of bacteria, and they also looked at the responses of two feeding deficient mutant strains, eat-2 and eat-5. Using measures of growth, they determined that two of the bacteria strains were ‘high quality’ food, two were ‘mediocre quality’ and one was ‘poor quality’.

The difference between the types of bacteria was that some were difficult to eat, while others were not. Worms given a choice of two strains of bacteria over a 2 hour period chose the higher quality bacteria in nine out of ten tests. When bacteria tested were of the same quality, worms chose randomly. Worms used chemotaxis to find the bacteria on the plate; however, they did not appear to have innate preferences. Food preferences seem to be developed over exposure time, suggesting that worms needed to try the food to make a decision.

Interestingly, worms with mutations that made it more difficult for them to eat — the eat-2 and eat-5 mutants — had stronger preferences for high quality food and roamed even on mediocre quality food. From the result of tests using mutants and worms with specific laser-ablated neurons, Avery and Shtonda [2] hypothesized that control of switching between the locomotion patterns of roaming and dwelling is the key to the food-seeking strategy of C. elegans. Their data suggest that the interneuron AIY, the differentiation of which is promoted by the LIM domain transcription factor TTX-3, acts to extend the time a worm spends seeking food, stimulating it to leave low-quality food to seek ‘greener pastures’.

Shtonda and Avery [1] showed how worms choose between high and low quality bacteria; however, some bacteria are actually toxic to worms. In their recent paper, Bargmann and colleagues [3] showed that C. elegans can learn to avoid odors associated with toxic bacteria. Pathogenic bacteria can proliferate in the intestine of C. elegans and after several days will kill the worms. Once again, worms were found to require experience to distinguish the quality of the food. Worms that had never experienced the pathogenic bacteria were as attracted to it as they were to non-pathogenic bacteria; however, worms that had had experience with the pathogenic bacteria strongly preferred non-pathogenic over the pathogenic bacteria in a choice test.

To test whether worms were learning a preference for the non-pathogenic bacteria, or an aversion to the pathogenic bacteria, Zhang et al. [3] developed a four choice maze which allowed them simultaneously to present odors of four different strains of bacteria and see which the worms would choose. In the maze there was a non-pathogenic bacteria and a pathogenic strain that the worm had experienced earlier, and a non-pathogenic and a pathogenic bacteria strain that the worms had never experienced. The results showed that both the proportion of worms approaching the known healthy bacteria and the proportion avoiding the known pathogenic bacteria increased compared to naïve worm choices, suggesting that olfactory learning on pathogens includes both attraction and aversion components.

Tests on adult worms showed that this learning occurs with exposures as short as 4 hours. Tests with a variety of mutant strains of worms deficient in serotonin neurotransmission led to the conclusion that serotonin is essential for pathogen-induced olfactory learning. By selectively rescuing the serotonin-deficient neurotransmission in specific identified neurons, Zhang et al. [3] determined that the ADF and NSM chemosensory neurons play a critical role in this olfactory learning, with AFD mediating the aversive signal and NSM mediating the attractive signal. Using immunocytochemistry, they then showed that exposure to pathogenic bacteria increases the serotonin level in the AFD neurons. The authors present data supporting the hypothesis that increased release of serotonin from the AFD chemosensory neurons activates Mod-1 serotonin receptors on the AIY and AIZ interneurons, thereby modulating the aversive learning.

It is interesting to note that both of these studies [13] have identified the AIY interneuron as important for the changes in food-seeking behavior after experience. It would be interesting to use the roaming and dwelling measures of Shtonda and Avery [1] on worms exposed to pathogenic bacteria to see if AIY is regulating the choice behavior in the pathogenic bacteria exposure, as it does in the food quality tests. The prediction is that the ttx-3 mutant worms would show abnormal learning in the pathogenic bacteria assay.

In investigating how worms choose optimal food, researchers observed the behavior of worms and hypothesized about the activity of identified neurons that are implicated in the behaviors observed. Faumont and Lockery [4] have developed a new procedure that will allow for testing these hypotheses: it allows simultaneous recording of behavior and activity in an identified neuron using a genetically encoded optical probe. The technique involves using two different microscope objectives, one low enough to view the entire worm, the other high enough to image a single identified neuron. Images of activity and behavior were captured simultaneously but separately using different wavelengths of light. In this experiment Faumont and Lockery [4] recorded changes in emission from the ‘cameleon’ calcium sensor in ASH sensory neurons in response to changes in chemical cues, while simultaneously recording the behavior of the semi-restrained worm. They were able to show a correlation between the probability of reverse swimming and calcium transients in ASH sensory neurons when exposed to an aversive chemical stimulus.

This technique could be used to test some of the hypotheses of Shtonda and Avery [1] and Zhang et al. [3], by allowing observations of activity in AIY and behavior of a semi-retrained worm exposed to different bacteria. Together these new studies show the power of combining genetic approaches with neural circuit analysis in an organism with a small tractable nervous system in which all neurons have been uniquely identified in order to determine the mechanisms of behavior.

Catharine H. Rankin

Source: Current Biology

Photo: yachist.ru

Similar articles:

Sirt1 improves healthy ageing and protects from metabolic syndrome-associated cancer

Genetic overexpression of protein deacetylase Sir2 increases longevity in a ...

Diet, nutrition and telomere length

The ends of human chromosomes are protected by DNA–protein ...

Low-Calorie Diet Staves off Aging & Death in Monkeys

It’s been a big week on the longevity front: First ...

Fact or Fiction? All Calories Are Created Equal

A new research study on protein overfeeding is causing a ...

Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly

Alterations in intestinal microbiota composition are associated with several chronic ...

Mediterranean Diet and Longevity

Diet and lifestyle influence morbidity and mortality. Among the elderly ...

COOKIE

Our site collects information using cookies to be more convenient and customized to your needs interests. The purposes of the use of cookies are defined in Policy the processing of personal data .If you agree to continue to receive cookies, please click the "Accept" button. If you don't agree or want to resolve this issue later, please change your browser cookie settings.